mmoa_writes: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
Isn't it odd to think that four years ago, me and [livejournal.com profile] glowering gave a short talk about LGBTQ history month, in the days when we still wore uniform and could get detention for badly done homework? I'm sure I could find the precise date if I cared to trawl through my LJ again. Living as I do at the library, I think the next best thing I could do to commemorate this month, would be to read the entire 'Lesbian and Gay' fiction section. Easy enough...

 I rather liked 'The Well of Loneliness', for instance, even though apprently Virginia Woolf hated it. But then, I'm simplistic like that - I like strong, solid prose. The idea can be as wacky as it likes, but anything written in a style that even remotely hints at the avant-garde usually sends me to sleep*. I am, it seems, a well-educated philistine.

Came across this from the F-word. I quite like the rather disturbing image it portrays, though perhaps the Jaws soundtrack was unintentional.




*I do try. I mean, I read 'The God of Small Things' and 'The Fugitive Pieces' and I absolutely loved them. Perhaps it's the more classical 'modern' writing I have difficulty with. Like I said, I am an utter philistine. I'd be the sort of person who sneered at Jackson Pollock when he first got big, lol...
There are 11 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] apiphile.livejournal.com at 10:37pm on 10/02/2009
Perhaps it's the more classical 'modern' writing I have difficulty with.

No one should have to read Ulysses, EVER. I had to read twelve pages of it once for a class and it was something akin to being stabbed repeatedly in the brain with a rusty banana.

In short: I agree.
 
posted by [identity profile] alagbon.livejournal.com at 10:52pm on 10/02/2009
I rather liked Ulysses, but then for instance I'm the kind of oddball who finds the music of Edgard Varèse enjoyable. And I wasn't required to read it for a class, which probably helped.
 
posted by [identity profile] glowering.livejournal.com at 10:39pm on 10/02/2009
Did we? I'd completely forgotten that, but I'm frightfully pleased to hear it. Did you say sensible interesting stuff and I just gurn?
 
posted by [identity profile] mmoa.livejournal.com at 10:49pm on 10/02/2009
Oh, come now. You had lots of fun with the Ancient Greeks for one thing (lol). Anyway, we were both brilliant, as far as I can remember. We even got Elise to change her mind and become... less homophobic.
 
posted by [identity profile] glowering.livejournal.com at 10:50pm on 10/02/2009
Oh I do remember that now actually. Hah. We were so cool.
 
posted by [identity profile] jeebus-uc.livejournal.com at 11:45pm on 10/02/2009
Did she hate it? I thought she went to court to defend it and all. Though I suppose one might do that for a book with themes you want to defend even if you don't enjoy the execution.
 
posted by [identity profile] mmoa.livejournal.com at 04:03pm on 07/03/2009
I quote: 'The dullness of the book is such that any indecency may lurk there - one simply can't keep one's eyes on the page...' lol. Virginia Woolf always seems like the queen of pithy remarks - I'd probably prefer reading her letters than her fiction. However, I can't say that with absolute authority until I've read Orlando, which nearly everyone says is her masterpiece.
 
posted by [identity profile] jeebus-uc.livejournal.com at 11:46pm on 07/03/2009
Well I found a Room of One's Own amusing (and obv. intelligent) so yeah try her essays and so on.

I loved Orlando. But if you don't like the modernist style then I dunno if it'll work for you, it's not very different style-wise from Dalloway or Lighthouse. Though it's more... colourful, I suppose, and I guess modernism tends to feel quite grey to me.

... you can tell I've lost the art of eng lit analysis, can't you?
 
posted by [identity profile] miss-morland.livejournal.com at 03:43pm on 11/02/2009
I enjoyed The Well of Loneliness too, despite its weaknesses and the fact that I thought Stephen came across as less sympathetic that was probably the author's intention. It's the kind of novel that would work well as a film, I think.
 
posted by [identity profile] mmoa.livejournal.com at 04:00pm on 07/03/2009
I totally agree. Sometimes I couldn't decie whether the author deliberately set out to make a less-than wholly sympathetic heroine, or if it was just that she was unsuccessful with her portrayal of Stephen. Either way, it still worked - maybe it was the sense of purpose behind the book: it made the story less... fudgy, so youc ould skate over it's weaknesses.

Why hasn't anyone turned this into a film, yet, I wonder. It would work really well.
 
posted by [identity profile] miss-morland.livejournal.com at 01:19pm on 08/03/2009
Oops, I meant to say that she was less sympathetic THAN was the author's intention - I think we're definitely meant to admire her...

Yes, I completely agree about the novel's film potential!

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5 6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31