mmoa_writes: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] mmoa_writes at 12:14am on 19/11/2006
Watched the 2005 Pride and Prejudice this afternoon and have to say that it was by far better than the earlier, famous Colin Firth version. It was a pity that this version was shorter, but then, it was made for cinema, not TV.


Some things, that felt right for the film, but I wasn't too sure about were there: the tenderer relationship between Mr and Mrs Bennett, for one (though that must make sense if they are to live as close together as they do) though I suppose it is true that there are always moments of love that even the worst matched couple in all creation experience. Nevertheless, their general relationship put that in perspective, so that was okay.

Country proto-middle class family, portrayed as such, unlike the Bennetts in the earlier version who just seemed like whining posh nobs. Here, one could see that the Bennetts were not wealthy. Dude, they had hay everywhere! And cows and geese that got in everyone's way! And Mud (with a capital 'M')! Wonderful.

This Darcy was (to me, anyway) far and away much better, but then, I'm not exactly fond of Colin Firth to be honest. Bingley was slightly pantomime-esque, but then, so was the other one *shrugs*. What can they do after all...

Oh and Mr Collins rocked. I was both repelled and sympathetic with him, which is as it should be. He is ridiculous, after all. However, I didn't like how they made Charlotte Lucas so fawning to Lady Catherine. I expected her to be more wry, but no matter: a very minor quibble.



Having great difficulty translating 'Electra', (God, what a bitch!) in between Diana Wynne Jones, heh...
Mood:: 'accomplished' accomplished
There are 2 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] jeebus-uc.livejournal.com at 01:45pm on 19/11/2006
Actually, I thought the more recent Pride and Prejudice was dull compared to the older one. Darcy seemed so stiff and unemotional that the guy just came off as a shit actor and well... it was just kinda boring... I'm surprised you prefer it, actually, most people seem to think the first was the superior.
 
posted by [identity profile] mmoa.livejournal.com at 10:32pm on 19/11/2006
As I never went to see it in the cinema when it came out, I was expecting it to be mediocre, but I was surprised by the fact that I liked it so much. There was just more realistic and mocking which suits Jane Austen's writing style (being one of the first British realists, after all) *shrugs. To me, anyway.

But then, I also liked Lost in Translation and The Piano, so maybe it's just me loving close up, 'emotional' camera shots of brooding youngsters in period costume/foreign cities.

Heh. Period-emo.

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5 6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31